BIOL 4160

Evolution

Phil Ganter

301 Harned Hall

963-5782

The Giant Pacific Octopus (Enteroctopus dofleini) grows up to 150 lbs (averages 40 lbs), has a tentacle-span of 15 feet, lives only 3 to 5 years, and a female can lay over 100,000 eggs.  Nnotice it's pupil is not round.  The cephalopod camera eye may represent a more rational design than our vertebrate camera eye.  We may be an example of suboptimal design (see below).

Some Patterns in Evolution

Email me

Link to a list of Specific Objectives for lectures

Back to:

Academic Page 
Tennessee State Home page 
BIOL4160 Page 
Ganter home page 

Evolution and Classification

Branching versus Hierarchical classification

  • Hierarchy is a classification scheme in which there is a "vertical" component, an idea of higher and lower, usually an outcome of inclusiveness in the sense that higher group in the hierarchy is composed of one or more groups from the next lower level
    • Domain-Kingdom-Phylum-Class-Order-Family-Genus-Species system is a hierarchical system
    • This is an artificial system because it requires the same number of levels to describe each organism but that may not be an accurate reflection of their evolutionary history
    • The inadequacy of this approach becomes obvious when you compare two species
      • Drosophila mauritiana is a member of the large, polyphyletic genus Drosophila (>1450 species) that occurs on the island of Mauritius in the Indian Ocean.  Its closest relative is D. simulans, from which it diverged about 250,000 MYA (McDermott SR, Kliman RM  2008  Estimation of Isolation Times of the Island Species in the Drosophila simulans Complex from Multilocus DNA Sequence Data.   PLoS ONE 3(6): e2442. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0002442)
        • According to Uniprot (a large database of protein  sequences from all organisms), the classification of D. mauritiana is as follows:  Arthropod (Phylum)-Mandible (Class)-Dicondylia-Pterygota-Neoptera-Endopterygota-Diptera (Order)-Brachycera-Muscomorpha-Eremoneura-Cyclorrhapha-Schizophora-Acalyptratae-Ephydroidea-Drosophilidae (Family)- Drosophilinae-Drosophilini-Drosophilina-Drosophiliti-Drosophila (Genus)-Sophophora-melanogaster group-melanogaster subgroup
      • Gingko biloba's closest living relative, probably a cycad, is a member of a different phylum, according to the USDA's hierarchical classification of plants, and from which it diverged at least 270 MYA (during the Permian - divergence time over a billion times longer than for D. mauritiana and its closest relative)
        • In order to adhere to the biological taxonomic hierarchy, we need to make a phylum, class, order, family and genus with only one member (Ginkgophyta-Ginkgoopsida-Ginkgoales-Ginkgoaceae-Ginkgo) to classify this one species
      • D. mauritiana classification involves adding many additional levels not seen in the classification of Ginkgo biloba
        • D. mauritana has 26 levels (3 below the level of the genus) and G. biloba has 5 levels (and it's the only member of its group on any level)
      • Thus, one hierarchy does not fit all organisms
  • A Branching system is one in which earlier groups divide to produce new groups and so they reflect time and do not necessitate have a hierarchical structure
    • The metaphor of a tree as a branching system is apt here (the trunk of the tree precedes -- or is more primitive than -- any branches that originate from it)
    • Branching classifications can be natural if the branches reflect the true evolutionary history
      • We are in a transition period between the common use of hierarchical classification and a more natural branching classification of life
    • Go to the "TREE OF LIFE" [http://www.tolweb.org] website to see a branching history of life
  • Phylogeneticists do not use hierarchical systems
    • Phylogenetic change can occur as a branching event (Cladeogenesis) or as change along a branch without a division (Anagenesis)
      • A Clade is an ancestor and all of its descendent lineages
      • Phylogenies are presented as Tree Diagrams
        • Cladograms - show only the branching (can be Rooted or Unrooted)
        • Phenograms - show the branching and the length of the branch indicates the distance between a taxon and its most recent ancestor (rooted trees) or between taxa (unrooted trees)
    • Will we do away with the hierarchical classification schemes?
      • As of now, the answer is no because:
        • the professional taxonomy societies have not abandoned hierarchies
        • databases (protein, nucleotide sequence, etc.) need the hierarchical system because they need to organize their data just like librarians need to organize theirs and the available computer algorithms for such tasks use hierarchies
    • Links to examples of:

Evidence for Evolution through Cladogenesis and Natural Selection

The evidence for evolution is to be found in the geological record

  • Darwin argued that evolution occurred as a branching process (cladogenesis), primarily through the mechanism of natural selection
    • Within the scientific community, there are no currently debated theories of evolution that do not involve cladogenesis but other explanations were part of the scientific debate when Darwin published his book and some have persisted outside of science up to the present
    • The most common alternative then and now was special creation for all species (and higher taxa)
  • Note that branching is a separate hypothesis from natural selection as the most influential mechanism of evolution and we do currently debate the relative importance of natural selection and other mechanisms of evolutionary change.

Evidence for Cladogenesis and Natural Selection

  • Hierarchical organization
    • I differ with the text in my definition of hierarchy, and so I differ with his citation of hierarchical classification as evidence for cladogenesis
      • To me, hierarchies must have levels, not just groups formed from pre-existing groups
    • Hierarchical classification's levels makes it possible to designate classes, orders, and families, while strictly branching classifications have no consistency in their groupings and the levels of taxonomy have no relevance
  • Evidence from Development
    • Homology
      • Homologous structures are those that are linked by development, even though their final forms may be very dissimilar
        • The same patch of cells that become a jaw bone in fish become an inner ear bone in mammals
        • Homology is why we find five digits in the wing of a bat, our hands, and a whale's flipper - all share similar developmental origins but all follow different developmental trajectories
      • Homology is evidence of cladogenesis because it can be explained through the independent modification of development once a branching event has occurred
      • Cladogenesis predicts homologous structures, whereas other patterns of evolution do not predict homology (although they may not be inconsistent with it)
    • Organisms that have lost characters (the text mentions the teeth in anteaters and an aquatic part of the life cycle in some amphibians), may still go through part of the development of the lost characters
        • Once again, this is predicted by cladogenesis but not by other means of evolution
  • Vestigial characters
    • Sightless eyes in cave dwellers (useful if not in caves), our ear muscles (useful if ears are mounted atop the head)
    • Cladogenesis predicts this one as well but no alternative does
  • Analogies
    • When two different lineages develop similar structures with equivalent functions, the power of natural selection is evident
  • Suboptimal Design
    • Natural selection selects the best from the available alternatives, no optimality is guaranteed unless the optimal alternative is present, so natural selection predicts the possibility of suboptimal design
    • No good engineer would design humans so that they could choke on their food
    • Why are our eyes designed so poorly that we have a blind spot - cuttlefish have a camera eye and no blind spot (we was robbed!)
  • Distribution of species
    • Related species often have distributions that can be predicted from the distribution of their common ancestor
  • Intermediate forms
    • Evolutionary history of cetaceans (whales and relatives)
    • Cladogenesis predicts intermediates but no other means of evolution

Evolutionary Trends and Systematics

Patterns in Development

  • Phenotypic evolution depends on development of the organism but this obvious truism has some subtle and interesting outcomes
    • Modular development
      • Many animals and plants are modular in that the overall body is composed of a series of modules that are basically all the same
        • In old fashioned zoology, this phenomenon is known as metamerism and the modules are called metameres (the book does not use these terms)
      • Although the modules start out similar, many modules have independent developmental pathways so that, when fully grown, they acquire specialized functions and are much modified in the adult organism
        • Due to the extensive modification modules may undergo, modules are often most easily seen early in development
      • This process of independent developmental fates for modules is called Individualization (the term does not refer to each organism developing into an individual but each module having an individual developmental fate)
        • This means of building a complex organism (similar to building a complex molecule, n'est-ce pas?) allows for small changes in the developmental pathways of individual modules to greatly alter the overall phenotype of an organism

Heterochrony

  • Phenotypic change can be effected by heterochrony: alterations to the timing of developmental events
    • One example is when the development of the reproductive system is altered relative to the rest of the organism so that the organism still has many juvenile features when it attains maturity, a process called Paedomorphosis (remember, maturity in biology is when an organism becomes reproductively competent)
    • The opposite example occurs when the development of the reproductive system is altered relative to some other part of the organism such that the non-reproductive feature of the organism develops past where it would otherwise be when the reproductive system matures, a process called Peramorphosis

Allometry

  • Allometric growth is produced by different parts of the body growing at different rates (our heads grow more slowly than our legs, for instance)
  • Many evolutionary changes to phenotypes are the result of alterations of the growth rate of individual body parts
    • We often detect allometry by relating the size of two body parts in several related species and looking for a line or curve that passes through the points (each species provides a point)
    • Many relationships are not linear but are described well by using a power curve (often called the allometric function):
      • If y is the size of one body part and x is the size of another, then the allometric function is

y = bxa

      • This equation is a curve but it can be linearized (turned into a linear equation of the form y = mx + b) by taking the log of each side (linear equations are easier to analyze)

log(y) = log(b) + a(log(x)) - a is the slope and log(b) is the y-intercept

    • If there is no allometry, then the growth of the body parts relative to one another is the same in each species (even though the overall size may differ) and the linearized allometric relationship has a slope of 1
      • Departures from this line are evidence of allometric growth
      • If one structure is doubled in size, the other is also doubled (allometry occurs when one structure is doubled but the other is changes by a ratio greater than or less than, but not equal to, 2)
  • Allometric change can involve changes in the rate of development, the duration of development, or the time of initiation of development of particular body parts or systems
    • Because growth is not linear, these changes can produce a great range of possible phenotypes from a very similar set of genes
      • For instance, Paedomorphosis (first graph below) can result from the slowing of the body's development relative to the reproductive system (Neoteny) or by halting growth early (Progenesis)
        • Neoteny is the reduction of the growth rate of a character
        • Progenesis results in a change in the ratio of sizes for the two structures
      • Peramorphosis may be the result of allowing growth to proceed for a longer period (second graph below)
        • Those structures growing fastest or longest will become very much larger than other, more slowly growing, structures

 

Heterotopy

  • This is the repositioning of body parts or a change in the place in which a gene is expressed
  • Many genes are expressed only in certain places (the gene for crystallin, the protein found in the eye's lens, has undergone heterotrophy as the gene products have gained new functions in the body)

Adaptive Radiation

  • This topic will be treated in several places but it refers to a burst of speciation within a lineage when that lineage colonizes a new habitat
  • Often seen on islands (land snails in the South Pacific) and in deep lakes ( Gammarid amphipods in Lake Biakal)

Genes and Genomes

Student Presentation

Last updated January 28, 2010