BIOL

4160

Evolution

Phil Ganter

Mountain Laurel

Paper Description

Email me

Back to:

Course

Syllabus

Bio 416

Home

Your paper should be an examination of an article or articles from evolution's primary literature.  For the purposes of this assignment, primary literature refers to the journals and books in which original data are presented. They are peer reviewed (even the books).  This means that, prior to publication, the material is given review by others who are also experts in the field and, based on the opinions of the reviewers, the editor of the journal or book has decided to publish the article.  This eliminates much poor, inaccurate, and speculative writing (although not all).  For our purposes, this is the stuff one must read if one is to become a biologist.  Familiarity with at least some primary biological literature is a necessary part of your undergraduate education.  For this reason, we will concentrate our efforts on including material from evolutionary primary literature.   Visiting one or two of the many websites dealing with evolution and presenting whatever comes up is not an option. 

However, when first entering a field, it is often difficult to begin by reading the primary literature.  Beginners are not the target audience of these publications.  You should begin with a very useful type of journal article called a review article.  They appear in many journals dedicated to primary literature and are so popular that there are now entire journals dedicated to review articles.  A review article will act as an introduction to a specific topic in evolutionary biology.  The target audience for these articles are biologists not familiar with the primary literature in the area but with considerable background in biology.  You are among the target audience for these articles.

So, unless you do not need a review of an area, this is the strategy to adopt in writing papers for this class.  Whether or not you have picked a topic or not, go to the TSU library's database page for databases in the biological sciences.  There, you will see a series of entries under "Current Trends in Ecology and Evolution", a monthly journal of review and opinion.  An alternative source of review papers is to go to the page for "Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics" on the electronic journals page.  This is a yearly publication with longer articles than are found in Current Trends.  Using the search option in the database, find a review on the topic you chose.  Download it and read it.  Then reassess your choice.  If you did not understand the review or were not interested in the topic, go back and choose another.  Do this until you have a topic you understand.

Then find a primary article (see above) that presents original data having to do with your topic.  You can do this in a number of ways.  You might choose one of the articles discussed in the review.  If the review is a few years old, you might want to search for a newer article.  This can be done by going to another of TSU's databases (go back to the database page).  Try to pick an article that you can download or give yourself enough time to get it from interlibrary loan.  Once again, read the article and decide if it is the right choice based on the paper description found in the next paragraph.

Your paper should, as stated above, examine a primary article.  You will want to summarize the topic (you can cite the review article here), paraphrase the questions addressed in the primary article and the hypotheses advanced by the authors as answers to the questions, describe the experimental design and methodology used to collect the data, summarize the results, and conclude with your opinions about whether or not the authors had successfully answered their questions and the contribution that the paper had made to furthering our understanding of the topic.

 Your audience for this paper is easy to define:  Phil Ganter.  It is not for a general audience and its purpose is to convince me that you have read and assimilated some aspect of evolutionary biology.  The papers need not be long (2-3 pages, if well written, can be enough but more is also OK if you need the space).   Focus on explaining an article from a scientific journal.  You must explain why the author or authors did the work, what they did, and how their data supports or refutes the goal of the authors.  Thus, you must place the paper in context with an introduction to the area.  In addition, you must understand the experiment thoroughly. 

Your paper must also cite any sources you use using the citation format below.

In addition, there are some other requirements, listed below.  Failure to compete the assignment (that is, to turn in a paper not as described above), to follow the instructions below, or to cite properly will result in a paper not being accepted and a 0 for the assignment.  The instructor may allow a paper to be re-written if it has received a zero for one of the stated purposes.

  1. All topics must be pre-approved by the instructor. 
  2. No paper papers will be accepted.  Submit your paper in electronic format (MS Word or RTF formats are the only acceptable formats) by sending it to my email address at pganter@tnstate.edu.  All word processor programs can format a file as an .rtf file!
  3. No quotations can be as long as a sentence in length.  I want to know what you know in your own words, not what your sources know.
  4. The original materials must be included, either as a paper copy or an electronic copy.

Citation Format

CITATIONS IN THE TEXT OF THE PAPER AND A LITERATURE CITED PAGE ARE ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY. ANY PAPER WITHOUT THEM WILL RECEIVE A ZERO FOR A GRADE.

In-Text Citations:

Citations are put into the body of the paper to note where an idea, fact, or quoted material has come from. Your papers and presentations, since you are re-packaging what information you have gathered from others, should be chock full of citations. Failure to do so is considered plagiarism and will result in a 0 for the paper, so put them in and follow your paper or outline with a literature cited page.

Be sure to place quotes around all sentences or phrases taken from the literature. After the quoted material, list its citation. Also, you have to cite any ideas or facts taken from the materials (Finknotle, 1992), even if you are not taking it word-for-word. Literature citations are to be done by placing the last name of the author and the year of the materials publication in parentheses at the end of the sentence or paragraph in which the material is mentioned (Finknotle and Glossip, 1989). When you are introducing several things from a single source in a series of sentences as part of a paragraph, then wait until you have presented them all before including a citation (this saves space and makes for less repetition). Examples for 1, 2, and 3-or-more authors (in order):

(Finknotle, 1992) for a single author, or (Finknotle and Glossip, 1989) for a pair, or (Finknotle et al., 1990) for more than two.

The literature cited section should come at the end of the text, must alphabetically list all materials consulted and should use the following formats:

Book

Author's Last Name, Initials. Year. Title. Publisher. City and country of publication, pages of interest (if not the entire book).

Article from a Book:

Author's Last Name, Initials. Year. Title of article. Ed. Editor of book. Title of book. Publisher. City and country of publication, page numbers of article.

Journal Article

Author's Last Name, Initials. Year. Title of article. Journal name, Volume number: pages (of entire article).

Internet material

Author's Last Name, Initials. Year. Title of article/Name of site. Internet site URL, date accessed.

Last Updated March 3, 2010